❮ Back to Juvare Blog

Are You Conducting After-Action Reviews? Here’s Why You Should Be

by Tim Beltz on Apr 27, 2018 6:40:28 PM
blog-aar-after-action-review.png

Having spent 21 years in the military and almost 20 years working in the emergency management field, I learned long ago that after-action reviews (AAR) are indispensable tools in an organization’s constant pursuit of improved performance and efficiency.

In the Army, we conducted an AAR after every training event and operation, no matter how large or small. We considered the planned objective and determined whether we achieved it. We looked at what went right in our plans and what did not. Finally, we dissected key decision points during the operation or exercise and evaluated those decisions in light of the situation and the information available at the time.

Hindsight is always 20/20, they say. In order to truly understand why a decision was made, one must evaluate the context that caused it. Although there are other aspects of an incident or exercise besides decision points that should be looked at when conducting your AAR, this article focuses on evaluating the decisions made and how an incident management software like WebEOC can help in that evaluation. After all, during an actual incident, the decisions that are made can have life or death consequences. 

Return to the Moment a Choice was Made

When training folks on our incident management solution, WebEOC, this is an area I always emphasize. Because of its reporting capabilities, and the fact that the system time stamps every change and captures information about the user who entered or changed the information, WebEOC offers a unique capability during an AAR to evaluate critical decisions made during an incident or training exercise. These features allow an organization to return to the moment a choice was made and take an in-depth look at what information was available that led them to their final decision. Users can also review information captured in their incident management system to rebuild in their minds exactly what the situation was at the time the decision was made to help them better understand the reasoning behind it.

Using this information during the AAR to evaluate the decisions made provides two positive organizational outcomes. First, it helps validate that the decision made was the best decision possible given the available information and the situation at the time. Second, it can help identify gaps in the information available in the moment that, had those details been available, might have resulted in a better decision. Such evaluation enables an organization to make adjustments to its information-gathering processes and procedures , so that the next time an incident occurs, they have better or more complete information available to make better decisions.

If you do nothing more than play Monday morning quarterback after an incident, exercise or training event, then you are selling yourself and your organization short, and missing the best opportunity to improve your organization’s operations. We recommend that you always take time to conduct a thorough AAR. Don’t just look at what went poorly and what went well; instead, scrutinize the decisions that were made and evaluate them using the information captured within your incident management solution.

By continually analyzing choices made and actions taken, and adjusting your information-gathering processes and procedures accordingly, your organization will continue to improve on the decisions that are made during those critical moments.

New call-to-action

 

Recent Posts

author avatar

This post was written by Tim Beltz

Tim Beltz is the Vice President of Military and Corporate Solutions at Intermedix. In this role, Tim provides leadership and management of customer relations, business development and services to U.S. Department of Defense and Corporate customers. Prior to joining Intermedix, Tim was a Signal Officer at the U.S. Army Reserve where he served in various leadership roles providing support to ground forces units in support of ground operations.t